Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53 41,461 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Memory 70.1 1-Core 46.5 2-Core 76.9 43% 64.5 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 108 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 113 7% 113 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 167C) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.69% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 1.25 2% 1.97 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 3.04 2% 2.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.69% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB 13,767 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03D1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,240 Write 44.5 Mixed 63.5 163% 783 MB/s	4K Read 344 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 4.7 529% 117 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 73%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 432 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 129GB free, PID 231b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 62 60 64 64 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 60.8 Write 24 Mixed 38 SusWrite 61.1 60% 46 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	38.6% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	626x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	150x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	15x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $108

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16