Asus H61M-F

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-F (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131212
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '20 at 06:45
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 80.8 1-Core 94.5 2-Core 181 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 224 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 228 14% 228 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 8A90) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.84% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 5.69 Parallax 3.84 4% 4.78 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 4.93 Splatting 3.13 4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.84% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 76 72 82 79 80 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.6% Below average	Read 223 Write 211 Mixed 106 SusWrite 82.2 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 9.4 50% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 79.8 DQ Mixed 16.9 33% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 53%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 226GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 102 101 107 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 107 Write 104 Mixed 66 SusWrite 100 69% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FLFF65F-D8KM9 04CD F3-1600C11-4GNT 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.1% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.8 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 14.3 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-F

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	20x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	18x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	15x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	31x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
120GB 120GBNetacBench 61%, 1,949 samples	6x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	6x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	5x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	4x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GBCorsairBench 25%, 525 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16