Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150 1,985 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 33.9 2-Core 70.3 35% 54.5 Pts	4-Core 71.9 8-Core 65.2 9% 68.6 Pts	64-Core 68 4% 68 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5830 2,946 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Gigabyte(1458 21E8) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 18.1 Reflection 12.5 Parallax 16.8 15% 15.8 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 13.8 Splatting 14.4 11% 13 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 150 168 172 171 178 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.9% Average	Read 179 Write 176 Mixed 157 SusWrite 159 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 23.4 73% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 29.2 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 38.9 38% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.33 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+AMDBench 41%, 5,594 samples	9x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+AMDBench 35%, 4,133 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 8800 GTSNvidiaBench 4%, 3,160 samples	3x
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	2x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16