| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | NVIDIA 122-CK-NF68 |
| Motherboard | EVGA 122-CK-NF68 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080904 |
| Uptime | 6.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 15 '20 at 23:03 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
42.6%
Average
|
35% 49.8 Pts
|
13% 100 Pts
|
7% 106 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
Nvidia(10DE 053C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
6.35%
Terrible
|
7% 6.63 fps
|
5% 6.46 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 40 52 53 52 MB/s
|
28.5%
Poor
|
32% 43.3 MB/s
|
119% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
11.2%
Very poor
|
9% 3.1 GB/s
|
8% 2.77 GB/s
|
38% 105 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 122-CK-NF68 Builds (Compare 33 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA 122-CK-NF68
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 13x |
| Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 5x |
| GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 2x |
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 35% - Below average | Total price: $252 |