DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory12.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090728
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 19:38
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
69% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 132
60% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 438
42% 347 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 730B) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.93% Terrible
Lighting 5.93
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 7.66
5% 6.82 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.04
5% 6.08 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.93%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0330AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 95 50 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.8% Above average
Read 256
Write 246
Mixed 234
SusWrite 74.6
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 28.5
93% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 177
133% 178 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 92%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
122GB free
Firmware: 3L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1060 780 659 666 666 663 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,216
Write 1,043
Mixed 1,008
SusWrite 749
225% 1,004 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 47.3
154% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 411
300% 396 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 160%
Great: 296%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
984GB free
Firmware: 1AA01117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 112
Write 51
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 107
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
95GB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 132 135 133 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 132
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
100GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 125 131 129 123 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 57.7
Write 120
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 121
128% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
194% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.5% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 8.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback