Lenovo 24476Q6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 24476Q6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 24476Q6
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 12:55
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 489
56% 439 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
Legend(17AA 21F6) 2GB
CLim: 745 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 7.75
6% 7.08 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 8.43
Splatting 9.22
7% 8.58 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 109 113 118 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 114
67% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback