Asrock 960GM-GS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 960GM-GS3 FX (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120521
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '20 at 11:39
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 64.1 2-Core 117 53% 85.3 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 274 32% 247 Pts	64-Core 228 14% 228 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17% Very poor	Lighting 13.8 Reflection 23 Parallax 32.3 11% 23 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 59 Splatting 37.8 28% 33.3 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 606GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 121 103 100 23 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 156 Write 156 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 80.8 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 1,303 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 305GB free, PID 2322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 22 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 23.5 Mixed 22 SusWrite 19.7 30% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 6,862 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 800 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.6% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 11.1 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GM-GS3 FX Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-GS3 FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	15x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	9x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	3x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	3x
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 47%, 2,338 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $273

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16