Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 00:09
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
1-Core 132
2-Core 255
92% 194 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 829
82% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,065
72% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3550 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40.1% Average
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 144
Parallax 142
6% 104 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 142
Splatting 143
42% 143 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$38
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 9.2 1.1 81 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 387
Write 361
Mixed 281
SusWrite 70.9
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 11.9
45% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 69.2
DQ Write 55.3
DQ Mixed 39.8
36% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
115GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 121 122 122 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 176
Write 151
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 122
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 2625 2TB
1TB free, PID 2625
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 97 98 95 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 74.7
Write 114
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 96.7
127% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$80
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 33.2
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 31
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 102%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback