Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 114% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190129
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '20 at 21:36
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 85 1-Core 140 2-Core 276 91% 167 Pts	4-Core 528 8-Core 908 87% 718 Pts	64-Core 1,495 92% 1,495 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8668) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 170 Parallax 167 130% 165 fps	MRender 197 Gravity 166 Splatting 115 125% 159 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1496 1441 1340 1231 1111 1009 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	280% Outstanding	Read 2,094 Write 1,701 Mixed 871 SusWrite 1,272 331% 1,484 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 58.2 201% 72.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,318 DQ Write 1,214 DQ Mixed 1,121 881% 1,217 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 280% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 288GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 446 443 464 466 458 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 462 Mixed 379 SusWrite 453 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 54.5 183% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 354 266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 174GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1788 1610 1111 1000 1001 1017 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	315% Outstanding	Read 2,355 Write 2,174 Mixed 1,696 SusWrite 1,254 419% 1,870 MB/s	4K Read 55.3 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 76.7 254% 89.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,594 DQ Write 1,360 DQ Mixed 1,444 1,091% 1,466 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 315% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C19 4x16GB 141 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	69.2% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 21.7 70% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 21.5 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 134%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 139%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,503x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,315x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1,119x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,345x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,038x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	802x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	738x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	582x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	522x

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,073

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16