PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H55/H57-UD3H (all builds) |
Memory | 7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100820 |
Uptime | 3.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 14 '20 at 20:06 |
Run Duration | 201 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 650-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 77 77 83 82 MB/s
|
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3500410SV 500GB-$31
15GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 104 107 112 112 MB/s
|
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
39GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 77 78 83 82 MB/s
|
50.7%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
65GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 102 102 116 119 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$50
52GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 76 83 85 83 87 MB/s
|
50.3%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
25.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples | 2x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 2x |
Xeon X3440IntelBench 65%, 6,034 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 2x |
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $202 |