Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4860HQ 1,015 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 190 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 521 52% 424 Pts	64-Core 526 32% 526 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M 18,736 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Gigabyte(1458 1756) ≥ 4GB CLim: 915 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.91 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 11% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 384GB 1,400 User benchmarks, average bench 130% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,385 Write 864 Mixed 452 197% 900 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 30.3 117% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 457 DQ Mixed 285 252% 375 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 184%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 50,772 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 145GB free Firmware: 2BC10003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 73 73 73 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 80 Write 65.3 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 71.8 49% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 2x8GB 939 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	MC Read 39.9 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 27.4 88% 31 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.3 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i7-4860HQIntelBench 69%, 1,015 samples	13x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples	14x

SSD
Raid 0 Volume 384GBIntelBench 130%, 1,400 samples	3x
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples	3x
LMT-128M6M 128GBLiteonitBench 71%, 622 samples	2x

RAM
BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 62%, 939 samples	4x
CT102464BF186D.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 1,504 samples	2x
TS1GSK64W6H 2x8GBTranscendBench 54%, 1,168 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16