Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '20 at 18:42
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 132
59% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 331
37% 292 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
Gigabyte(1458 229A) 3GB
CLim: 1072 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 46
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 57.5
38% 45.7 fps
MRender 31.7
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 41.7
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 135 84 85 86 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 445
Write 137
Mixed 178
SusWrite 103
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 28.3
88% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 104
88% 132 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 104%
LSI MR9266-8i 9TB
1TB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 180 185 171 177 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR9266-8i 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 67 68 68 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
138GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 87 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 126
Write 127
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 87.3
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 76%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
56GB free
Firmware: AV00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 51
SusWrite 78
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
437GB free
Firmware: AX0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 91 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 62.8
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 90.1
52% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
18GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 11 9.8 11 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 18.5
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 13.1
24% 20 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
84% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40EG8BFWB- 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 933 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 17.1
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 13.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback