Asrock X370M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock X370M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '20 at 16:57
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 477
64% 476 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 75.1
47% 68.5 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 63.4
53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 85 33 64 33 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 506
Write 101
Mixed 266
SusWrite 57.2
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.7
41% 9.77 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 88%
Samsung HD252KJ 250GB
14GB free
Firmware: CM100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 25 20 20 21 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 47.5
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 20.7
24% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
4GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 31.5
Mixed 20.2
20% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R744G2400U1S 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 33.1
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 26.3
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370M-HDV Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $283
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback