Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2815 1,028 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	32.1% Below average	Memory 58 1-Core 20 2-Core 38 28% 38.7 Pts	4-Core 38.9 8-Core 38.8 5% 38.8 Pts	64-Core 37.9 2% 37.9 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 14DD) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.76% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.96 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.88 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.76% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 104 7.7 88 19 121 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.8% Poor	Read 235 Write 190 Mixed 165 SusWrite 82 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 9 34% 8.97 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1L16BC4R1-BQ7S 1x4GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	153x
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	79x
Celeron N2815IntelBench 27%, 1,028 samples	58x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	338x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	136x
ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 20%, 728 samples	50x
AO1L16BC4R1-BQ7S 1x4GBAdataBench 17%, 369 samples	32x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16