Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire M5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M5910
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100517
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateJan 14 '20 at 09:58
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 152
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 205
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E810) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
9.75% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 8.41
10% 10.6 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 8.33
Splatting 12.6
8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.75%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
460GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 70 57 76 87 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 96.7
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 74.4
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
29GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 26.6
Write 15.2
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 12.4
22% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.4
123% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 39%
Seagate Backup+ SL 1TB
256GB free, PID ab20
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 18.7
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 18.5
28% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 13.5
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $301
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback