Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 196 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 507 55% 439 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K610M 780 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 197B) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 650 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.73 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	4.07% Terrible	Lighting 4.83 Reflection 4.42 Parallax 4.53 4% 4.6 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 5.18 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.07% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 124 125 127 128 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 425 Write 131 Mixed 129 SusWrite 125 44% 203 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 62.4 4K Mixed 15.2 86% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 47 83% 168 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB 26,681 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 16.4 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples	153x
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples	117x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	106x

SSD
MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 3,736 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	12x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	41x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	20x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	15x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $150

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16