Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 97% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190801
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '20 at 22:55
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Memory 69 1-Core 143 2-Core 271 86% 161 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 893 88% 718 Pts	64-Core 1,438 89% 1,438 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% EVGA(3842 3173) CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 146 Parallax 113 113% 133 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 142 Splatting 116 117% 148 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 123%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 573GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 374 427 444 443 446 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 410 Mixed 365 SusWrite 405 93% 412 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 42.8 120% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 199 145% 190 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$65 38,251 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.3% Good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 27.8 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 24.5 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,636x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,260x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,408x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,233x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,465x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	864x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	769x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	645x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16