Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FA
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '20 at 19:50
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	8%
CPU Throttled	91%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8145U 15,431 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 182 76% 129 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 234 32% 239 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1961) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.43% Terrible	Lighting 6.63 Reflection 8.96 Parallax 6.78 5% 7.46 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 5.67 Splatting 13.5 8% 9.86 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.43% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB 4,910 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 666 262 263 265 264 263 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 696 Write 534 Mixed 617 SusWrite 330 122% 545 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 19.9 100% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 420 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 295 231% 324 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 130%
Wilk 8GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 7GB free, PID 5200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 4.9 5.3 5.3 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	7.25% Terrible	Read 29.8 Write 13.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 5.1 14% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 29% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.25% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Kingston 9905711-007.A00G 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.5% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 20.6 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 23.2 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	109x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	94x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	37x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	240x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	4x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	35x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	32x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	15x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	44x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 1,799 samples	37x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16