Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170220
Uptime	41.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '20 at 12:46
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 186 66% 117 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 547 55% 448 Pts	64-Core 548 34% 548 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 158 Reflection 203 Parallax 184 128% 182 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 181 Splatting 128 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba E300 2TB-$69 2,046 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 664GB free (System drive) Firmware: MZ4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 113 112 108 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 100 Write 109 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 110 62% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 86%
Hitachi TOURO S 1TB 1,083 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 92GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 69 64 72 73 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 85.8 Write 3.5 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 69 31% 43.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 44% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 75%
USB Flash Disk 8GB 1,522 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.8 4.7 3.7 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	2.14% Terrible	Read 8 Write 3.3 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 4.3 7% 5.35 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.14% Great: 24%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 318GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 80 81 81 81 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	35% Below average	Read 79 Write 80.5 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 80.6 98% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS 2x8GB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	86% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 29.6 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 18.2 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	9x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBAdata $82Bench 242%, 74,184 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	5x
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	5x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $322

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16