| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus F1A55 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110913 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 13 '20 at 06:58 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X4 651
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
47.4%
Average
|
44% 66.9 Pts
|
19% 150 Pts
|
12% 188 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.7%
Very poor
|
20% 28.2 fps
|
20% 24.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 43 37 34 32 33 MB/s
|
34.6%
Below average
|
21% 95.4 MB/s
|
54% 19.6 MB/s
|
53% 97.6 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49
163GB free
Firmware: MS1OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 133 140 140 137 140 MB/s
|
75%
Very good
|
77% 107 MB/s
|
158% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36%
Below average
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
18% 6.2 GB/s
|
42% 95.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical F1A55 Builds (Compare 2 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus F1A55
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $170 |