Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 19:56
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 87
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 118
57% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 404
38% 313 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 39.6
28% 34.6 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 35
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 90GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 63 71 116 72 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 148
Write 92.5
Mixed 112
SusWrite 78.2
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 20
73% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 86.9
DQ Mixed 88.3
71% 101 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
157GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 66 67 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 73
Write 74
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 65.8
51% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 59%
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
14GB free
Firmware: HH100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 36 36 35 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 61.8
Write 64.7
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 35.7
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 17.6
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback