Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4 (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100916
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '20 at 14:52
Run Duration	1554 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 95.3 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 161 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 404 42% 339 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5850 15,020 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 0330) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.39% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 0.27 Parallax 0.31 1% 0.44 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 0.39% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 0 51 60 64 64 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.8% Below average	Read 170 Write 112 Mixed 105 SusWrite 49 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 20.8 69% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 38 DQ Mixed 24.2 20% 27.9 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 242GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 109 60 61 63 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 132 Write 102 Mixed 59.9 SusWrite 69.4 67% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 84%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 94GB free Firmware: 1AJ1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 79 78 81 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 66.3 Write 92.3 Mixed 55.1 SusWrite 80.7 54% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	43.1% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 13.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.4 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 56.1 71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55A-UD4 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	66x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	48x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	12x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	45x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	43x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $528

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16