Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FA
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '20 at 12:39
Run Duration	335 Seconds
Run User	UZB-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 86 1-Core 123 2-Core 240 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 618 65% 519 Pts	64-Core 652 40% 652 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 16,200 User benchmarks, average bench 26% HP(103C 85FA) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29% Poor	Lighting 37.1 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 35.9 30% 34.7 fps	MRender 27.8 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 31.4 27% 32.6 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel HBRPEKNX0101AH 256GB 701 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 316 312 319 323 322 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 549 Write 319 Mixed 351 SusWrite 318 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 100 4K Write 97.1 4K Mixed 47.5 264% 81.5 MB/s	DQ Read 868 DQ Write 614 DQ Mixed 288 338% 590 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 148%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 466GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 115 115 115 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 108 Write 109 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 114 72% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 2x16GB 2,145 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 25.6 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 30.5 SC Mixed 23.8 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,607x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,504x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	497x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 113%, 8,196 samples	424x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	414x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	278x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	717x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	431x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	399x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16