PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T7400 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0RW199 |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20080821 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 12 '20 at 06:35 |
Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
47.4%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
|
36.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 50 58 73 88 MB/s
|
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x1GB
8 of 16 slots used
8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
|
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X54721stBench 48%, 256 samples | 20x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54401stBench 46%, 452 samples | 13x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 22x |
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $238 |