Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '20 at 05:27
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 216
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 449
57% 431 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 4011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.2% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 115
Parallax 118
95% 116 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 113
Splatting 94.6
99% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 163 170 155 150 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 473
Mixed 359
SusWrite 182
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 52.6
176% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 236
213% 322 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
172GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 84 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 86
Write 83
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 85.9
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
129% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
179GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 76 79 85 87 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 65.5
Write 111
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 76.7
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
199% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST6000VN0041-2EL11C 6TB
352GB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 119 123 123 123 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 29.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback