Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion Notebook (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 809D
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150820
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '20 at 23:19
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	27.6% Poor	Memory 39.4 1-Core 24 2-Core 47.8 24% 37.1 Pts	4-Core 92.1 8-Core 94 12% 93.1 Pts	64-Core 94.2 6% 94.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 809D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 3.28 2% 2.33 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 2.57 Splatting 2.13 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 311 309 310 314 314 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 458 Write 413 Mixed 411 SusWrite 318 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 28.8 92% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 128 96% 128 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 129%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.2 4.9 5 5 5.6 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 19.8 Write 6 Mixed 12.9 SusWrite 5.2 13% 11 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.8 144% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 17%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB 13,827 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 35 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 35.3 Write 35.6 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 35 45% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB 44,908 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 5.4 17% 5.93 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	1,939x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,402x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	807x

SSD
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	262x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	146x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	132x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	393x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	317x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	264x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16