PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Blade Shadow Computer (all builds) |
Motherboard | Blade ShadowM |
Memory | 8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190103 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 11 '20 at 18:40 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 36 38 39 45 MB/s
|
29%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Blade I5BJADY1WFXZK2-6ZP 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
27.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 61%, 7,521 samples | 416x |
Xeon E5-2667 v3IntelBench 64%, 2,246 samples | 147x |
EPYC 7543P 32-CoreAMDBench 71%, 974 samples | 24x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples | 298x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 256x |
RTX A4500NvidiaBench 146%, 1,594 samples | 24x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |