Fujitsu Celsius W420

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	74.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Fujitsu Celsius W420 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3162-C1
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141201
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '20 at 15:44
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 85.1 1-Core 94.1 2-Core 186 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 470 49% 392 Pts	64-Core 465 29% 465 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 36FC) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.5% Very good	Lighting 89.9 Reflection 93.3 Parallax 80.4 73% 87.9 fps	MRender 91.3 Gravity 93.3 Splatting 96.1 77% 93.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 278GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 913 504 501 499 502 500 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung PM851 mSATA 256GB 6,648 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 136GB free Firmware: EXT48D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 254 254 205 251 235 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 473 Write 259 Mixed 196 SusWrite 242 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 24.8 98% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 82 124% 236 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 83%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 459GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 90 92 92 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 108 Write 100 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 90.8 65% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 16.8 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.5 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Celsius W420 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu Celsius W420

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	93x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	79x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $145Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	6x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	5x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,893 samples	10x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	7x
M378B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 58%, 1,445 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16