Gigabyte GA-H110M-H DDR3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-H DDR3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H DDR3-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180309
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '20 at 15:41
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	DOM-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$132 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 116 2-Core 217 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 431 60% 441 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB 4,895 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM11.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 65 63 35 81 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 306 Write 260 Mixed 164 SusWrite 64.4 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 15.3 4K Mixed 15.1 28% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 158 114% 144 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 80%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 570GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 90 95 94 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 120 Write 104 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 91.2 70% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 77%
Wd5003abyx-23 00W1141 00W1445IBM 500GB 383 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 168GB free Firmware: WC36 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 84 84 86 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 88.2 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 84.3 62% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 78%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 140GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 74 74 74 75 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 74.5 Write 76 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 73.5 50% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 12GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 17.2 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.2 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H DDR3-CF

CPU
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	75x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	46x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	43x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	41x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	23x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	15x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	21x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	20x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $68

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16