Lenovo 20KS005BSC

Performance Results

Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemLenovo 20KS005BSC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20KS005BSC
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '20 at 19:03
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 156
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 331
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 312
21% 312 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon 500
Legend(17AA 5069) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 26.20.15011.5007
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 51.9
Parallax 56.5
11% 50.2 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 42.3
6% 27.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 17%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$44
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 312 318 320 320 317 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 818
Write 740
Mixed 648
SusWrite 341
143% 637 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 74.6
245% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 665
DQ Mixed 715
538% 720 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 162%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FE Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 21.7
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 24.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback