Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Z97-PRO GAMER (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160226
Uptime	5.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '20 at 16:07
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 87 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 193 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 614 58% 480 Pts	64-Core 615 38% 615 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275 75,918 User benchmarks, average bench 85% AMD(1002 0B36) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.1% Excellent	Lighting 99.5 Reflection 87.2 Parallax 172 81% 120 fps	MRender 87.3 Gravity 95.9 Splatting 118 84% 100 fps
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$35 2,811 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 194 190 195 188 189 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 652 Write 634 Mixed 620 SusWrite 219 119% 531 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 83.3 4K Mixed 51.2 165% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 774 DQ Write 567 DQ Mixed 658 495% 666 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 193%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 22GB free Firmware: 580ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 95 114 99 87 96 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 369 Write 194 Mixed 244 SusWrite 104 50% 228 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 41.3 145% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 194 149% 204 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 87%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 48GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 93 98 93 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 97 Write 90 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 96.4 64% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 254GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 114 114 114 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 146 Write 132 Mixed 85 SusWrite 113 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 83%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 62.2 Write 57 Mixed 44.8 41% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 85 Write 86.2 Mixed 82.2 64% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 0GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 104 Write 90.2 Mixed 66.7 65% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
ASMT 2105 1TB 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 197GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 121 122 122 120 122 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 147 Write 85.5 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 119 146% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 79%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB 2,863 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 11 11 10 11 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	7.81% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 10.5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 10 13% 11 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 41% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.81% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 19,522 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	57.3% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 18.9 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,396x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	541x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	293x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	453x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	220x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	181x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	187x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	74x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	108x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $648

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16