HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 17:32
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 844
81% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 47.9
52% 57 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 68.6
56% 68 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 388
Write 276
Mixed 235
66% 300 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 35.4
148% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 185
167% 258 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 164%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
164GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 146 151 151 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 125
Write 71.2
Mixed 74
SusWrite 148
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
73GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 34
Write 36.2
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 21.2
37% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 1TB
814GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 38.2
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 19.8
42% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 28.8
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 27.4
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback