To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190324
Uptime17 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 12:41
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 80
2-Core 185
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 725
65% 551 Pts
64-Core 1,800
111% 1,800 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 59.3
54% 64.3 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 67.5
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN256NVMe-M.2/80 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0802C0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 733 281 78 78 92 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,365
Write 709
Mixed 952
SusWrite 221
180% 812 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 32.2
140% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 459
DQ Write 507
DQ Mixed 71.8
168% 346 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 132%
Great: 197%
CHN 25SATAC3 512 512GB
269GB free
Firmware: R0430A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 417 418 423 428 423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 429
Mixed 416
SusWrite 404
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 27.3
116% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 56.6
101% 194 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MK7OAA30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 155 154 154 155 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 140
Write 151
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 151
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown lanshuo 0QB0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 36.5
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.8
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback