| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1152 x 864 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111110 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 09 '20 at 10:22 |
| Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
| Run User | MAR-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.2%
Very good
|
69% 115 Pts
|
42% 306 Pts
|
21% 333 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1494) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3517
|
1.04%
Terrible
|
1% 1.16 fps
|
1% 1.57 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 82 94 94 98 MB/s
|
54%
Above average
|
64% 86.8 MB/s
|
160% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
49.4%
Average
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
58% 68.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,758 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 684x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 590x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 314x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 137x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 85x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |