HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170621
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 05:57
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 184
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 516
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 838F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4771
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 5.93
Reflection 25
Parallax 5.16
5% 12 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 5.33
Splatting 11.6
6% 7.11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
899GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 325 314 324 312 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 356
Write 335
Mixed 318
SusWrite 320
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 21.7
72% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 122
90% 117 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 99%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 80 72 76 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 116
Write 83
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 80.4
54% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
10GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 8.1 9.1 8.1 9.4 8.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 7
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 7.9
16% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.1
179% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC8T1-BQXS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback