Asus G75VW

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus G75VW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G75VW
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130107
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '20 at 05:56
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	67%
CPU Throttled	60%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 38.5 2-Core 75.8 40% 61 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 171 18% 147 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M 7,381 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 2115) 2GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	8.05% Terrible	Lighting 8.97 Reflection 8.19 Parallax 10.5 7% 9.23 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 10.7 Splatting 11.9 10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.05% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 137 135 133 127 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 296 Write 132 Mixed 133 SusWrite 136 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 20.4 70% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 163 144% 220 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 129%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 255GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 70 70 69 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 60.5 Write 43.7 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 68.6 39% 52.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB 11,714 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 17 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

CPU
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	344x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	248x
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	340x
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	274x
GeForce GTX 770NvidiaBench 9%, 2 samples	1x

SSD
LAT-256M3S 256GBLiteonitBench 75%, 575 samples	29x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 48%, 3,420 samples	65x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,421 samples	60x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16