Lenovo 4524AE6

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 4524AE6 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110711
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '20 at 05:26
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	69%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 168 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 462 46% 377 Pts	64-Core 467 29% 467 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3070) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.25% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 1.16 1% 1.41 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.43 2% 1.86 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.25% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 284GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 289 296 296 281 198 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.6% Good	Read 281 Write 283 Mixed 235 SusWrite 277 61% 269 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 20.5 75% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 325 244% 325 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 594GB free Firmware: JC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 104 105 107 107 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 83.3 Write 76.8 Mixed 55 SusWrite 104 59% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 3,195 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 358GB free, PID 2312 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.36% Terrible	Read 25 Write 18 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 16 26% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.36% Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 579GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 13 12 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.3% Very poor	Read 24.3 Write 20.8 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 12.5 25% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 11%
MB3000GC WLU 2TB 2TB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.91% Terrible	Read 24 Write 6.8 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 1.7 12% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 48% 0.73 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.9% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 14 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.7 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 4524AE6

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)