Toshiba Satellite A660

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemToshiba Satellite A660  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA NWQAA
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110914
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 08 '20 at 11:19
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 28
2-Core 40.6
32% 43.2 Pts
4-Core 51.6
8-Core 58.3
7% 54.9 Pts
64-Core 62.1
4% 62.1 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Toshiba(1179 FD30) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.83
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 0.97
2% 2.52 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 3.35
2% 3.68 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$100
700GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 188 202 199 177 197 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.7% Average
Read 194
Write 208
Mixed 216
SusWrite 189
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 22.5
71% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 72.3
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 132
89% 106 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 126%
WD Elements 2TB
769GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 28
Write 21.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 13.2
27% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 45%
WD Elements 2TB
326GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 21.8
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 13.2
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 45%
WD My Book Essentials 1.5TB
343GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 17.5
Write 20.7
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 13.1
25% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.6
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Satellite A660 Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite A660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $285
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $379Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback