Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dh0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8600
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190531
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '20 at 05:48
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Memory 92.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 251 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 755 77% 625 Pts	64-Core 973 60% 973 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q) 7,789 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8600) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.3% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 131 Parallax 111 85% 116 fps	MRender 150 Gravity 99 Splatting 95.6 92% 115 fps
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 102%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Dell(1028 3600) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 150 Reflection 168 Parallax 172 122% 163 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 160 Splatting 117 104% 127 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB 4,992 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 309GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 607 255 141 106 56 59 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 94%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 82GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 216 215 215 215 216 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 385 Write 381 Mixed 347 SusWrite 216 75% 332 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 26.7 86% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 99.5 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 110 81% 106 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 97%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 464GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 215 215 214 213 216 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	60% Good	Read 387 Write 379 Mixed 363 SusWrite 215 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 26.6 86% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 96.9 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 105 78% 102 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 22.8 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 25.6 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 50%

Yacht

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	483x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 77%, 6,944 samples	274x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	219x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	265x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	176x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	114x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	348x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	81x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	78x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16