Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 838F
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '20 at 04:55
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 61 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 156 58% 102 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 412 44% 351 Pts	64-Core 496 31% 496 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3602 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Lighting 41.1 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 40.2 34% 37.2 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 34.7 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA1-8D128-HP 128GB 4,097 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: A182 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 711 Write 377 Mixed 491 116% 526 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 24.3 110% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 532 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 268 223% 332 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 337%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 230GB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 402 417 366 359 359 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 346 Write 341 Mixed 320 SusWrite 369 78% 344 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 27.3 88% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 47.9 DQ Mixed 80.9 69% 106 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4S26BFSDK.8FBD 2x8GB 188 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 18.6 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 11.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,347x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	785x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	777x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	272x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	158x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	308x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16