Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181206
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 22:51
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 731
75% 605 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 32.8
29% 31.4 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 33.5
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 47 42 48 47 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 480
Mixed 361
SusWrite 71.8
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 53.9
183% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 230
212% 325 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 118%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
597GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 131 130 131 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 94.3
Write 98.3
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 130
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 85%
TOSHIBA STOR.E PARTNER 1TB
618GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 75.3
Write 77.7
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 99
94% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback