bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
System
MotherboardIntel DG33BU
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090715
Uptime16.1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 18:01
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 67.3
24% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 68.9
8-Core 67.3
9% 68.1 Pts
64-Core 67.9
5% 67.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 17%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 89 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.9% Average
Read 207
Write 196
Mixed 180
SusWrite 108
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 24
82% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 36.5
34% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 93%
WD WD1600JB-00GVC0 160GB
68GB free
Firmware: 20.00K20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 47 45 44 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 44.8
Write 44.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 44.9
30% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical bin Builds (Compare 52,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback