Asus GT51CH

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus GT51CH (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GT51CH
Memory	55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '20 at 14:19
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	43%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 123 2-Core 225 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 500 55% 434 Pts	64-Core 476 30% 476 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8725) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.2% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 121 Parallax 124 96% 121 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 119 Splatting 100 88% 108 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 135 69 48 57 59 MB/s Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.3% Good	Read 267 Write 180 Mixed 217 SusWrite 93.2 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 81.5 4K Mixed 26.8 122% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 148 152% 250 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 95GB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 163 106 91 93 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 131 Write 160 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 117 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 76.D105G.D090B 4x16GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	68.5% Good	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 24.7 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 22.5 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GT51CH Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

System: Asus GT51CH

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	168x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	10x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	97x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	25x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	15x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	65x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	33x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	12x

RAM
HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 43%, 3,066 samples	63x
M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 5,600 samples	19x
HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 2x16GBHynixBench 77%, 940 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $382

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16