Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	31.7% Below average	Memory 31.5 1-Core 47 2-Core 93.9 32% 57.5 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 183 25% 184 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	2.15% Terrible	Lighting 2.83 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 2.72 2% 3.02 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.57 Splatting 0.13 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.15% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKF180H6H 180GB 517 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: LSF034N SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 106 76 77 78 80 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.5% Below average	Read 208 Write 191 Mixed 185 SusWrite 98.1 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 10.2 59% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 130 104% 147 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 88%
SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 13 9.8 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	7.1% Terrible	Read 21.4 Write 7.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 11.3 13% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.7 44% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.1% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 8.6 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 246 16% 246 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16