Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 06 '20 at 21:07
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 404
54% 402 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.2% Good
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 67.6
61% 73.4 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 73
58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 205 144 89 73 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 488
Write 452
Mixed 357
SusWrite 133
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 41.4
136% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 205
183% 276 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 118%
Samsung HE103UJ 1TB-$87
173GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 65 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 48.6
Write 72.4
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 65.7
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33%
Great: 65%
Seagate ST4000NM0025 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: N003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 46 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69% Good
Read 194
Write 45.7
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 46.4
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 69%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB-$179
334GB free
Firmware: E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 27 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 27.2
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 28.2
22% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST3300655SS 300GB
7GB free
Firmware: 1652
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37% Below average
Read 82.5
Write 49.3
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 46
43% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.2
212% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 37%
Great: 70%
Lexar JumpDrive P10 USB 3.0 32GB-$71
21GB free, PID a836
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 204 224 198 225 207 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 152
Write 234
Mixed 137
SusWrite 198
254% 180 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.4
156% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $364
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback