Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '20 at 21:55
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Memory 84.9 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 493 8-Core 985 87% 739 Pts	64-Core 1,354 84% 1,354 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Lighting 69.2 Reflection 68.8 Parallax 97.2 56% 78.4 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 71 Splatting 58 53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB 32,020 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,047 Write 1,296 Mixed 1,128 260% 1,157 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 70.4 225% 80.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,060 DQ Write 900 DQ Mixed 977 733% 979 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 298%
Samsung PM871 M.2 2280 128GB 841 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 107GB free Firmware: EMT23D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 100 57 62 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 488 Write 65.8 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 72 37% 172 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 23.8 104% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 64.1 DQ Mixed 62.4 76% 139 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 89%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 3,622 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 96GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 130 Write 77.3 Mixed 73.8 110% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 3.1 198% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB 9,626 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 44.4 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 38.5 118% 41.3 GB/s	SC Read 29.5 SC Write 43.6 SC Mixed 34.9 103% 36 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	601x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	153x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	117x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	117x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	112x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	104x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	50x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	113x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	77x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16