bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67CL
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110523
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 20 '16 at 03:29
Run Duration454 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 53.6
37% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 99.7
8-Core 182
17% 141 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
HP(103C 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 10.7
12% 13.2 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 15.5
11% 12.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 500
Write 243
Mixed 332
79% 358 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 22.2
101% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 75.4
84% 143 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73%
Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion 640GB
402GB free
Firmware: 060E
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 76.1
Write 68.8
Mixed 68.7
54% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.33
84% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 45%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
145GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 85
Write 74.6
Mixed 71.3
58% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.4
104% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 51%
Maxtor STM3320820AS 320GB
96GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 62.5
Mixed 56.6
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.28
72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 44%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
75GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 87.9
Write 72.9
Mixed 73.5
59% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.22
82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 54%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 94.5
Write 87.4
Mixed 65.8
103% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.21
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 49%
ST310005 20AS 1TB
501GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 28.7
Mixed 6.55
26% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.42
59% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 19%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB
275GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 99.6
Write 111
Mixed 85.9
127% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.26
74% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 81%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 750GB
271GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 24.4
Mixed 27.3
34% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.21
21% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 21%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 500GB
209GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 27.9
Mixed 26.1
36% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.25
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 67%
SAMSUNG HD502IJ 500GB
130GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 26.9
Mixed 28.8
37% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.32
70% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback