PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds) |
Memory | 27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190909 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 04 '20 at 22:44 |
Run Duration | 200 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 68% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
85.7%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3212) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$58
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 778 544 544 765 721 692 MB/s
|
231%
Outstanding
|
|||
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
127GB free
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 199 202 316 292 274 MB/s
|
53.6%
Above average
|
|||
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
90GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 156 143 78 127 92 MB/s
|
52.6%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba X300 4TB-$149
181GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 133 127 170 163 161 MB/s
|
78.8%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
119GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 73 93 90 93 MB/s
|
42.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.8%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $270Bench 99%, 60,132 samples | 1,156x |
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples | 867x |
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $415Bench 88%, 197,342 samples | 866x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3080Nvidia $670Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 606x |
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $585Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 526x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,238Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 485x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $1,580 |