PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 17 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141202 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 04 '20 at 18:55 |
Run Duration | 258 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
47%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.41
|
53.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
21.7%
Poor
|
||||
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 67 59 52 54 MB/s
|
35.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
384GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 47 58 61 66 MB/s
|
37.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
101GB free
Firmware: 01.00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 80 77 78 76 MB/s
|
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
37GB free
Firmware: CC9D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 81 77 78 77 MB/s
|
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
12%
Very poor
|
||||
ASMT 2105 500GB
308GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 16 15 15 16 MB/s
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
ST2000DM001-1CH1 2TB
5GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 10 10 13 12 11 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
ASMT 2105 2TB
1TB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 22 20 20 MB/s
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
|||
KINGWIN EZD-2537U3 2TB
151GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.6 9.2 9.6 9.6 MB/s
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
|
24.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 506x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 324x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $128 |