Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 137%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171019
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 04 '20 at 15:56
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$350
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
94% 166 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 867
84% 674 Pts
64-Core 1,064
71% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$719
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 521
Reflection 492
Parallax 597
137% 537 fps
MRender 251
Gravity 509
Splatting 273
132% 344 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 132%
Great: 144%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$213
671GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1916 1833 1609 1510 1513 1560 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 1,572
Write 1,545
Mixed 1,342
SusWrite 1,657
345% 1,529 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 65.1
244% 96.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,349
DQ Write 1,182
DQ Mixed 1248
940% 1,260 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 295%
Great: 377%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$85
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 277 276 277 277 347 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 271
Mixed 312
SusWrite 303
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 44.4
157% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 227
203% 306 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 115%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$294
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 123 123 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 81
Write 95.8
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 124
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston XRMWRN-HYA 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 25.3
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 24.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 102%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 10,887 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $931
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback